Bazaro
Comparison

Bazaro vs. Fourth

Fourth was founded in London in 1999 and, since merging with HotSchedules in 2019, has been headquartered in Austin, Texas. It combines workforce management (scheduling, time and attendance, HR and payroll) with inventory, purchasing and AI forecasting for multi-site restaurant and hospitality chains, and it reports more than 120,000 locations. Bazaro focuses on the financial back office of food businesses: supplier invoices, contracts, recipes, stock and purchasing.

Headquarters

United States

Typical customer size

Enterprise

Markets

United States, United Kingdom, Australia

What Fourth does well

01.

Workforce management built for hospitality: scheduling, time and attendance, payroll, tips and labour compliance

02.

AI demand forecasting that drives schedules, production plans and suggested orders across many sites

03.

Proven at very large scale, with brands such as Taco Bell, KFC, Greene King and Wagamama

04.

Purchase-to-invoice control for food and drink: EDI ordering, AI invoice capture, three-way matching and contract-price checks

What makes Bazaro different

01.

Supplier invoice automation for all spend, not only food and drink, with multi-level approvals on mobile and by email

02.

Supplier contracts and e-signatures linked to invoices

03.

A wholesale webshop (Dockolo) and a central kitchen module for operators who supply other businesses

04.

Allergen tracking for all 14 EU allergens on every dish, flagged automatically when supplier ingredients change

05.

Published monthly prices for InvoiceIQ and KitchenFlow

Feature comparison

FeatureBazaroFourth
Built specifically for restaurants & food service
Yes
Yes
Recipe costing with live ingredient prices
Yes
Yes
Allergen tracking for all 14 EU allergens
Fourth: allergen and nutrition publishing; the 14 EU allergens are not stated explicitly
Yes
Partial
Stock counts by voice, barcode or tap, with variance flagging
Yes
Yes
Food waste recording by ingredient and reason
Yes
Yes
AI purchase suggestions and ordering direct to suppliers
Yes
Yes
Menu engineering with POS sales data
Yes
Partial
Supplier invoice automation with approval workflows
Fourth: AI capture, three-way matching and approvals for food and drink supplier invoices
Yes
Partial
Supplier invoice prices flow into recipe costs automatically
Yes
Yes
Supplier contracts and e-signatures linked to invoices
Fourth: contract-price checks; no contract repository or e-signature found
Yes
Partial
Prices published on the website
Yes
No
Multi-location / multi-entity support
Yes
Yes

Which solution fits your situation?

Choose Bazaro if…

You want supplier invoices, contracts, recipes, stock and purchasing in one platform built for food businesses, and you already have a separate system for staff scheduling and payroll, or you don't need one.

Choose Fourth if…

You run a large restaurant or hospitality chain and want workforce management, payroll and inventory from one vendor, with AI forecasting across hundreds of sites.

Sources and notes

This comparison is based on publicly available information, mainly Fourth's own website. Products and prices change, so check the details with each supplier. If you think something here is inaccurate, email [email protected] and we will review it promptly. Fourth is a trademark of its owner. Bazaro is not affiliated with or endorsed by Fourth.

Features we could not verify for Fourth are left out of the table rather than marked as missing.

Sources

Ready to see Bazaro in action?

Book a free 30-minute demo tailored to your type of operation.